<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pages ’12: Top 3 list of improvements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betalogue.com/2012/11/06/pages12-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2012/11/06/pages12-features/</link>
	<description>Notes from an unfinished world…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:09:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betalogue &#187; Word 2011: A mind of its own?</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2012/11/06/pages12-features/comment-page-1/#comment-9539</link>
		<dc:creator>Betalogue &#187; Word 2011: A mind of its own?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/?p=4276#comment-9539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Long-time Betalogue readers know that I could write about how crappy Microsoft Word is all day long. However, there is only so much you can say before the sheer inanity of the thing makes you want to do unspeakable things to a Bill Gates or Steve Ballmer voodoo doll. At that stage, I guess you just have to let it go and try to write about how superior Pages ’09 is instead (even though it is, of course, far from perfect). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Long-time Betalogue readers know that I could write about how crappy Microsoft Word is all day long. However, there is only so much you can say before the sheer inanity of the thing makes you want to do unspeakable things to a Bill Gates or Steve Ballmer voodoo doll. At that stage, I guess you just have to let it go and try to write about how superior Pages ’09 is instead (even though it is, of course, far from perfect). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
