<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard): Click-through in Finder windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betalogue.com/2009/11/02/click-through/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2009/11/02/click-through/</link>
	<description>Notes from an unfinished world…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glass Maze &#8211; Fitts and Startts&#8217; Law</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2009/11/02/click-through/comment-page-1/#comment-8543</link>
		<dc:creator>Glass Maze &#8211; Fitts and Startts&#8217; Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/?p=2852#comment-8543</guid>
		<description>[...] Igot discovers that the clickthrough behavior in Snow Leopard&#8217;s Finder has progressed from unintuitive to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Igot discovers that the clickthrough behavior in Snow Leopard&#8217;s Finder has progressed from unintuitive to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Rants &#187; Mac OS X Click Through</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2009/11/02/click-through/comment-page-1/#comment-8542</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Rants &#187; Mac OS X Click Through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/?p=2852#comment-8542</guid>
		<description>[...] Betalogue has some interesting points about the weirdness of clickthrough to unfocused Finder windows, but reaches completely wrong conclusion in my opinion. All clickthrough for non window-management widgets should be disabled &#8211; clicking on an unfocused window means &#8220;give this window focus&#8221;, it should never mean &#8220;give this window focus and activate whatever random item in the window I clicked on&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Betalogue has some interesting points about the weirdness of clickthrough to unfocused Finder windows, but reaches completely wrong conclusion in my opinion. All clickthrough for non window-management widgets should be disabled &#8211; clicking on an unfocused window means &#8220;give this window focus&#8221;, it should never mean &#8220;give this window focus and activate whatever random item in the window I clicked on&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Tsai - Blog - Click-Through in Snow Leopard</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2009/11/02/click-through/comment-page-1/#comment-8539</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Tsai - Blog - Click-Through in Snow Leopard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/?p=2852#comment-8539</guid>
		<description>[...] Pierre Igot: How is the user supposed to &#8220;know&#8221; and remember intuitively that click-through now only works in icon view mode and not in list view mode and column view mode? And how is the user supposed to &#8220;know&#8221; and remember intuitively that, even though click-through no longer works, &#8220;double-click-through&#8221; (to coin a phrase) still does? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pierre Igot: How is the user supposed to &ldquo;know&rdquo; and remember intuitively that click-through now only works in icon view mode and not in list view mode and column view mode? And how is the user supposed to &ldquo;know&rdquo; and remember intuitively that, even though click-through no longer works, &ldquo;double-click-through&rdquo; (to coin a phrase) still does? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

