<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Word for Windows documents in Mac OS X: Apple&#8217;s Pages more compatible than Word 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/22/word-for-windows-documents-in-mac-os-x-apples-pages-more-compatible-than-word-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/22/word-for-windows-documents-in-mac-os-x-apples-pages-more-compatible-than-word-2008/</link>
	<description>Notes from an unfinished world…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:49:25 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bricks Without Clay &#187; Getting the raw images in Pages documents</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/22/word-for-windows-documents-in-mac-os-x-apples-pages-more-compatible-than-word-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-8202</link>
		<dc:creator>Bricks Without Clay &#187; Getting the raw images in Pages documents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 04:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/22/word-for-windows-documents-in-mac-os-x-apples-pages-more-compatible-than-word-2008/#comment-8202</guid>
		<description>[...] get the specifics of embedded images. If you want to know whether an image is a PNG or GIF or what, the interface doesn&#8217;t make it easy, as pointed out on [...]

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#039;s server IP (64.111.110.4) doesn&#039;t match the comment&#039;s URL host IP () and so is spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] get the specifics of embedded images. If you want to know whether an image is a PNG or GIF or what, the interface doesn&#8217;t make it easy, as pointed out on [...]</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#8217;s server IP (64.111.110.4) doesn&#8217;t match the comment&#8217;s URL host IP () and so is spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
