<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard): Why is the music file preview image so ugly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/01/mac-os-x-105-leopard-why-is-the-music-file-preview-image-so-ugly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/01/mac-os-x-105-leopard-why-is-the-music-file-preview-image-so-ugly/</link>
	<description>Notes from an unfinished world…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/01/mac-os-x-105-leopard-why-is-the-music-file-preview-image-so-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-8110</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/01/mac-os-x-105-leopard-why-is-the-music-file-preview-image-so-ugly/#comment-8110</guid>
		<description>as &quot;ssp&quot; said:
I’m much more concerned by the lack of proper playback/navigation controls which are a real decrease in usability.

-- 

I could not agree more. Why would they take out these controls? It there some way to get them back. I want to be able to fast forward/rewind the audio file. Pretty lame apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as &#8220;ssp&#8221; said:<br />
I’m much more concerned by the lack of proper playback/navigation controls which are a real decrease in usability.</p>
<p>&#8211; </p>
<p>I could not agree more. Why would they take out these controls? It there some way to get them back. I want to be able to fast forward/rewind the audio file. Pretty lame apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssp</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/01/mac-os-x-105-leopard-why-is-the-music-file-preview-image-so-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-8082</link>
		<dc:creator>ssp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/01/mac-os-x-105-leopard-why-is-the-music-file-preview-image-so-ugly/#comment-8082</guid>
		<description>I see plenty of JPEG artifacts around the edges of the note in your graphics. Those don&#039;t appear on my screen.

There definitely are different algorithms for scaling. I believe in that in principle, QuickDraw, Cocoa, QuickTime and Quartz Composer might use different algorithms for scaling. My guess would be that Cocoa does it in this case because we&#039;re dealing with Quick Look. But that&#039;s only a guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see plenty of JPEG artifacts around the edges of the note in your graphics. Those don&#8217;t appear on my screen.</p>
<p>There definitely are different algorithms for scaling. I believe in that in principle, QuickDraw, Cocoa, QuickTime and Quartz Composer might use different algorithms for scaling. My guess would be that Cocoa does it in this case because we&#8217;re dealing with Quick Look. But that&#8217;s only a guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Igot</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/01/mac-os-x-105-leopard-why-is-the-music-file-preview-image-so-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-8081</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre Igot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/01/mac-os-x-105-leopard-why-is-the-music-file-preview-image-so-ugly/#comment-8081</guid>
		<description>I used JPEG because the result did not produce any noticeable difference. Anyone can verify on their own Mac OS X 10.5 install that the graphic looks pretty much the same as above, even without compression.

I agree that it is a minor &quot;inconvenience&quot; compared to navigational issues and the like, but it still jars. 

The PNG file you referred to looks &lt;strong&gt;much&lt;/strong&gt; better, and paradoxically when viewed scaled in the &quot;Preview&quot; column in the Finder in column view it looks pretty good too (and still looks good if I vary the width of the &quot;Preview&quot; column, which causes further scaling).

So the problem might be not with the scaling algorithm used in for the &quot;Preview&quot; column, but with another algorithm somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used JPEG because the result did not produce any noticeable difference. Anyone can verify on their own Mac OS X 10.5 install that the graphic looks pretty much the same as above, even without compression.</p>
<p>I agree that it is a minor &#8220;inconvenience&#8221; compared to navigational issues and the like, but it still jars. </p>
<p>The PNG file you referred to looks <strong>much</strong> better, and paradoxically when viewed scaled in the &#8220;Preview&#8221; column in the Finder in column view it looks pretty good too (and still looks good if I vary the width of the &#8220;Preview&#8221; column, which causes further scaling).</p>
<p>So the problem might be not with the scaling algorithm used in for the &#8220;Preview&#8221; column, but with another algorithm somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssp</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/01/mac-os-x-105-leopard-why-is-the-music-file-preview-image-so-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-8080</link>
		<dc:creator>ssp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/01/mac-os-x-105-leopard-why-is-the-music-file-preview-image-so-ugly/#comment-8080</guid>
		<description>P.S. It might be a good idea to use a lossless graphics format to illustrate issues like this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. It might be a good idea to use a lossless graphics format to illustrate issues like this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssp</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/01/mac-os-x-105-leopard-why-is-the-music-file-preview-image-so-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-8079</link>
		<dc:creator>ssp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/01/mac-os-x-105-leopard-why-is-the-music-file-preview-image-so-ugly/#comment-8079</guid>
		<description>Just for the heck of it: My guess is that two things are the problem here: The original file (System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/QuickLookUI.framework/Versions/A/Resources/DisplayBundles/Music.qldisplay/Contents/Resources/music.png) already exhibits this effect to a certain extent. And the scaling algorithm Apple use makes it even worse when scaling down. I found that standard Quartz scaling often aggravates such artifacts - particularly on edges at an angle. Using a different algorithm like Lancozs might solve the problem.

I assume that using vector rather than pixel graphics for this could be another solution. No idea about how feasible that&#039;d be in terms of the gradients used in this graphics and for the speed when scaling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the heck of it: My guess is that two things are the problem here: The original file (System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/QuickLookUI.framework/Versions/A/Resources/DisplayBundles/Music.qldisplay/Contents/Resources/music.png) already exhibits this effect to a certain extent. And the scaling algorithm Apple use makes it even worse when scaling down. I found that standard Quartz scaling often aggravates such artifacts &#8211; particularly on edges at an angle. Using a different algorithm like Lancozs might solve the problem.</p>
<p>I assume that using vector rather than pixel graphics for this could be another solution. No idea about how feasible that&#8217;d be in terms of the gradients used in this graphics and for the speed when scaling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssp</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/01/mac-os-x-105-leopard-why-is-the-music-file-preview-image-so-ugly/comment-page-1/#comment-8078</link>
		<dc:creator>ssp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2008/04/01/mac-os-x-105-leopard-why-is-the-music-file-preview-image-so-ugly/#comment-8078</guid>
		<description>No, I have cover art in my music files, so I&#039;m not seeing this.

I&#039;m much more concerned by the lack of proper playback/navigation controls which are a real decrease in usability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I have cover art in my music files, so I&#8217;m not seeing this.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m much more concerned by the lack of proper playback/navigation controls which are a real decrease in usability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

