<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can&#8217;t stand Microsoft Word 2004 for Mac OS X? Try WordPerfect in Windows XP for a while…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/</link>
	<description>Notes from an unfinished world…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 11:48:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arden</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-6946</link>
		<dc:creator>Arden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/#comment-6946</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Arden: PDF’s not an option. They need to be able to edit the files. And I don’t really have a choice about having them as clients. They are part of my regular, full-time job clientele.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Aw man, you just gave away the punchline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Arden: PDF’s not an option. They need to be able to edit the files. And I don’t really have a choice about having them as clients. They are part of my regular, full-time job clientele.</p></blockquote>
<p>Aw man, you just gave away the punchline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danridley</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-6945</link>
		<dc:creator>danridley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/#comment-6945</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The hardest thing about moving from Windows to OS X for me was giving up Wordperfect.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Agreed. I actually considered running WP/Mac 3.5 in Classic when I made the switch, but I knew I&#039;d have to bite the bullet eventually.
&lt;blockquote&gt;ut based on my (admittedly limited) experience, WordPerfect can’t be a much more pleasant experience.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Lockups and crashes are lousy, of course, but WP is a dream compared to WinWord. Again, they&#039;ve lost their edge a bit with 12 and X3, but there&#039;s still a wealth of power and utility there. Real table of contents and index features, cross-references that maintain themselves, the ability for people with minimal training to clean up even fairly hairy formatting issues with Reveal Codes... 

It&#039;s never been entirely free of stability issues, but up to v12 it was at least better than WinWord in that regard. X3&#039;s stability can only claim to be no worse than Word, which isn&#039;t a very high bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The hardest thing about moving from Windows to OS X for me was giving up Wordperfect.</p></blockquote>
<p>Agreed. I actually considered running WP/Mac 3.5 in Classic when I made the switch, but I knew I&#8217;d have to bite the bullet eventually.</p>
<blockquote><p>ut based on my (admittedly limited) experience, WordPerfect can’t be a much more pleasant experience.</p></blockquote>
<p>Lockups and crashes are lousy, of course, but WP is a dream compared to WinWord. Again, they&#8217;ve lost their edge a bit with 12 and X3, but there&#8217;s still a wealth of power and utility there. Real table of contents and index features, cross-references that maintain themselves, the ability for people with minimal training to clean up even fairly hairy formatting issues with Reveal Codes&#8230; </p>
<p>It&#8217;s never been entirely free of stability issues, but up to v12 it was at least better than WinWord in that regard. X3&#8242;s stability can only claim to be no worse than Word, which isn&#8217;t a very high bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Igot</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-6944</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre Igot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/#comment-6944</guid>
		<description>Cynops: Personally, I really want to avoid having to do actual work in Windows XP within Parallels as much as possible. It&#039;s OK for testing stuff, but when it comes to actual work, I need a number of tools (Spell Catcher X, Default Folder X, etc.) that are not available in that environment.

Arden: PDF&#039;s not an option. They need to be able to edit the files. And I don&#039;t really have a choice about having them as clients. They are part of my regular, full-time job clientele.

dmglaw: Thanks for the offer. But I have to figure out a way to make this work on  my own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynops: Personally, I really want to avoid having to do actual work in Windows XP within Parallels as much as possible. It&#8217;s OK for testing stuff, but when it comes to actual work, I need a number of tools (Spell Catcher X, Default Folder X, etc.) that are not available in that environment.</p>
<p>Arden: PDF&#8217;s not an option. They need to be able to edit the files. And I don&#8217;t really have a choice about having them as clients. They are part of my regular, full-time job clientele.</p>
<p>dmglaw: Thanks for the offer. But I have to figure out a way to make this work on  my own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmglaw</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-6943</link>
		<dc:creator>dmglaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/#comment-6943</guid>
		<description>if you woul like to send me a file, i&#039;d be happy to convert it so you can see what you get.  The results are really very good  dgoldman is my email  and if you put your mouse over my name above you will see the domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you woul like to send me a file, i&#8217;d be happy to convert it so you can see what you get.  The results are really very good  dgoldman is my email  and if you put your mouse over my name above you will see the domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arden</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-6942</link>
		<dc:creator>Arden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/#comment-6942</guid>
		<description>Just return translated files as PDF&#039;s.  I know, I know, it&#039;ll annoy everyone because they don&#039;t have Adobe Reader installed, but it&#039;ll save you lots of time and effort.  And that, of course, is the most important thing.  You didn&#039;t need them as clients anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just return translated files as PDF&#8217;s.  I know, I know, it&#8217;ll annoy everyone because they don&#8217;t have Adobe Reader installed, but it&#8217;ll save you lots of time and effort.  And that, of course, is the most important thing.  You didn&#8217;t need them as clients anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynops</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-6941</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/#comment-6941</guid>
		<description>I have the same problem but I get around it by simply using WordPerfect 11 via Parallels.
I don&#039;t have time to screw around with translators and the people I work with don&#039;t want their files fouled up. Word Perfect 11 is not hard to wrap your brain around and I have found it to be quite stable. You can still buy a nice, new, fully legal copy of WordPerfect 11 for about $100-. If you want to keep your clients happy, which is usually a good thing, just bite the bullet and use the program that your clients use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the same problem but I get around it by simply using WordPerfect 11 via Parallels.<br />
I don&#8217;t have time to screw around with translators and the people I work with don&#8217;t want their files fouled up. Word Perfect 11 is not hard to wrap your brain around and I have found it to be quite stable. You can still buy a nice, new, fully legal copy of WordPerfect 11 for about $100-. If you want to keep your clients happy, which is usually a good thing, just bite the bullet and use the program that your clients use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Igot</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-6940</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre Igot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/#comment-6940</guid>
		<description>dmglaw: I don&#039;t really have the same experience with MacLinkPlus Deluxe. I have several significant issues with the software itself (some described in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.betalogue.com/2004/11/03/datavizs-maclinkplus-deluxe-15-beyond-pathetic/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt;) and I also still don&#039;t understand how they could remove some filters/file formats from the software under the pretext that they were &quot;out of date&quot; (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://support.dataviz.com/support.srch?docid=14048&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this tech note&lt;/a&gt;, in the section about MLPD 12). I mean, isn&#039;t the whole point of an application like MLPD to provide access to file formats that are otherwise no longer accessible? How can some translators ever become “out of date?” Who on earth decides that?

More important, however, its WordPerfect translators are not all that good in my experience. Some paragraph formatting always gets mangled, especially (but not only) in tables. NeoOffice appears to do a better job of rendering WordPerfect documents. As for converting documents &lt;em&gt;to&lt;/em&gt; the WordPerfect formats, again my experience is not very positive—but I am talking about issues affecting French texts in particular.

silas: I am only bad-mouthing WP based on the fact that it freezes when I try to open certain RTF files that open just fine in any other application (Mac or Windows) that I try—and that it adds &quot;Z&quot; prefixes to my accented &quot;é&quot; characters without my permission. (Dan: I agree with you that it probably has to do with Unicode…) Apart from that, I don&#039;t have any specific problems with it :-). As for the &quot;Reveal Codes&quot; stuff, well, it&#039;s just a bit too scary for me and my good old WYSIWYG inclinations… (And the government agencies that I work for certainly don&#039;t seem to have that great a need for &quot;powerful and exact formatting options.&quot; I barely ever get any documents that use style sheets in any way, shape or form, let alone half-properly.)

I am certainly not defending Microsoft, either with respect to its industrial tactics or with respect to the quality of its own products, far from it! But based on my (admittedly limited) experience, WordPerfect can&#039;t be a much more pleasant experience.

I am always keeping an eye on word-processing alternatives, and am waiting for the &quot;Pro&quot; version of Nisus. I&#039;ll have to see how good a job it does with WordPerfect files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dmglaw: I don&#8217;t really have the same experience with MacLinkPlus Deluxe. I have several significant issues with the software itself (some described in <a href="http://www.betalogue.com/2004/11/03/datavizs-maclinkplus-deluxe-15-beyond-pathetic/" rel="nofollow">this post</a>) and I also still don&#8217;t understand how they could remove some filters/file formats from the software under the pretext that they were &#8220;out of date&#8221; (see <a href="http://support.dataviz.com/support.srch?docid=14048" rel="nofollow">this tech note</a>, in the section about MLPD 12). I mean, isn&#8217;t the whole point of an application like MLPD to provide access to file formats that are otherwise no longer accessible? How can some translators ever become “out of date?” Who on earth decides that?</p>
<p>More important, however, its WordPerfect translators are not all that good in my experience. Some paragraph formatting always gets mangled, especially (but not only) in tables. NeoOffice appears to do a better job of rendering WordPerfect documents. As for converting documents <em>to</em> the WordPerfect formats, again my experience is not very positive—but I am talking about issues affecting French texts in particular.</p>
<p>silas: I am only bad-mouthing WP based on the fact that it freezes when I try to open certain RTF files that open just fine in any other application (Mac or Windows) that I try—and that it adds &#8220;Z&#8221; prefixes to my accented &#8220;é&#8221; characters without my permission. (Dan: I agree with you that it probably has to do with Unicode…) Apart from that, I don&#8217;t have any specific problems with it :-). As for the &#8220;Reveal Codes&#8221; stuff, well, it&#8217;s just a bit too scary for me and my good old WYSIWYG inclinations… (And the government agencies that I work for certainly don&#8217;t seem to have that great a need for &#8220;powerful and exact formatting options.&#8221; I barely ever get any documents that use style sheets in any way, shape or form, let alone half-properly.)</p>
<p>I am certainly not defending Microsoft, either with respect to its industrial tactics or with respect to the quality of its own products, far from it! But based on my (admittedly limited) experience, WordPerfect can&#8217;t be a much more pleasant experience.</p>
<p>I am always keeping an eye on word-processing alternatives, and am waiting for the &#8220;Pro&#8221; version of Nisus. I&#8217;ll have to see how good a job it does with WordPerfect files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silas</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-6939</link>
		<dc:creator>silas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/#comment-6939</guid>
		<description>2 points to be made - by someone who spent the years from System 7 to OS 10.1 using Windows 95, 98, 2000 and XP, and only came back to the Mac with the advent of Jaguar.

Wordperfect in its day was far an away the best word processing program available, on any OS. Say the words &quot;reveal codes&quot; in public and you&#039;re bound to be harassed by seom former WP junkie. It was better than MS Word, and cheaper, which is why government agencies used it.  Its powerful and exact formatting options made it the best choice for law firms.  Corporations went to MS, thanks to expensive lobbying and the necessity of Excel and Powerpoint compatibility, and eventually law firms were forced to change as well, to communicate with their corporate clients.) Anyway, that&#039;s point 1: before you go bad-mouthing WP, realize that it once was the best thing out there. Version 10 was great.  The hardest thing about moving from Windows to OS X for me was giving up Wordperfect.

Point 2: it was hard until I realized that OS X, being a smaller market, has much better competitive choice among word processors.  The one that I settled on, that not enough people know about, is Nisus Writer Express.  It&#039;s got the best UI of any word processor I&#039;ve ever worked with; it&#039;s half the price of MS Word; it&#039;s compatible with MS Word files, and with many of Word&#039;s more advanced features; and it opens Wordperfect files flawlessly.  In addition to being the best word processor I&#039;ve ever used, NWE has enabled me to bring everything I wrote for ten years over to OS X with me, with no fuss.

Oh, and Nisus has a Pro version coming out in a couple months.  If you continue to work with .wpd files, and just because it&#039;s a great program, I suggest you check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 points to be made &#8211; by someone who spent the years from System 7 to OS 10.1 using Windows 95, 98, 2000 and XP, and only came back to the Mac with the advent of Jaguar.</p>
<p>Wordperfect in its day was far an away the best word processing program available, on any OS. Say the words &#8220;reveal codes&#8221; in public and you&#8217;re bound to be harassed by seom former WP junkie. It was better than MS Word, and cheaper, which is why government agencies used it.  Its powerful and exact formatting options made it the best choice for law firms.  Corporations went to MS, thanks to expensive lobbying and the necessity of Excel and Powerpoint compatibility, and eventually law firms were forced to change as well, to communicate with their corporate clients.) Anyway, that&#8217;s point 1: before you go bad-mouthing WP, realize that it once was the best thing out there. Version 10 was great.  The hardest thing about moving from Windows to OS X for me was giving up Wordperfect.</p>
<p>Point 2: it was hard until I realized that OS X, being a smaller market, has much better competitive choice among word processors.  The one that I settled on, that not enough people know about, is Nisus Writer Express.  It&#8217;s got the best UI of any word processor I&#8217;ve ever worked with; it&#8217;s half the price of MS Word; it&#8217;s compatible with MS Word files, and with many of Word&#8217;s more advanced features; and it opens Wordperfect files flawlessly.  In addition to being the best word processor I&#8217;ve ever used, NWE has enabled me to bring everything I wrote for ten years over to OS X with me, with no fuss.</p>
<p>Oh, and Nisus has a Pro version coming out in a couple months.  If you continue to work with .wpd files, and just because it&#8217;s a great program, I suggest you check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmglaw</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-6938</link>
		<dc:creator>dmglaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/#comment-6938</guid>
		<description>I am sure others use WordPerfect, but typically it seems to be used by Attorneys and some educators.  I use MacLink Plus and it works flawlessly.  We get estate-planning documents all the time from clients in Word Perfect and have to convert them to Word.  MacLink Plus is expensive, but if you use it regularly what is $79 for great, accurate conversions.  (Much better than any of the online services and even better than when Word Perfect saves in Word format. The other software may be free, but its not automated.  If you only need one file converted every month, I am sure it will be fine, We convert several files a day and sometimes over a hundred.  With MacLink Plus you can convert them at once and get back to what your real job is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure others use WordPerfect, but typically it seems to be used by Attorneys and some educators.  I use MacLink Plus and it works flawlessly.  We get estate-planning documents all the time from clients in Word Perfect and have to convert them to Word.  MacLink Plus is expensive, but if you use it regularly what is $79 for great, accurate conversions.  (Much better than any of the online services and even better than when Word Perfect saves in Word format. The other software may be free, but its not automated.  If you only need one file converted every month, I am sure it will be fine, We convert several files a day and sometimes over a hundred.  With MacLink Plus you can convert them at once and get back to what your real job is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danridley</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-6937</link>
		<dc:creator>danridley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/#comment-6937</guid>
		<description>If you can still get your hands on a trial copy, you&#039;re likely to have better luck with WordPerfect 10 or 11. 12 and 13/X3 introduced more stability issues, but the WPD file format hasn&#039;t changed substantially since v7.

From versions 6 to 10, WordPerfect was far and away superior to Word on Windows. They&#039;ve lost some of the advantage, and unfortunately it&#039;s not because Word has gotten better.

There&#039;s one area where Word is now better: international language support was a strong point for WordPerfect for many, many years, but WP never moved to Unicode, so its internationalization looks really hacky by comparison to everything else these days. 

This may be what you&#039;re running into with your RTFs; when I last looked into RTFs and Unicode (mid-2004), OpenOffice was writing them incorrectly. (The RTF spec asked for both ANSI *and* Unicode characters in the file, and OpenOffice was only inserting the Unicode characters. It&#039;s likely that WordPerfect would choke on these files.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can still get your hands on a trial copy, you&#8217;re likely to have better luck with WordPerfect 10 or 11. 12 and 13/X3 introduced more stability issues, but the WPD file format hasn&#8217;t changed substantially since v7.</p>
<p>From versions 6 to 10, WordPerfect was far and away superior to Word on Windows. They&#8217;ve lost some of the advantage, and unfortunately it&#8217;s not because Word has gotten better.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s one area where Word is now better: international language support was a strong point for WordPerfect for many, many years, but WP never moved to Unicode, so its internationalization looks really hacky by comparison to everything else these days. </p>
<p>This may be what you&#8217;re running into with your RTFs; when I last looked into RTFs and Unicode (mid-2004), OpenOffice was writing them incorrectly. (The RTF spec asked for both ANSI *and* Unicode characters in the file, and OpenOffice was only inserting the Unicode characters. It&#8217;s likely that WordPerfect would choke on these files.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Igot</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-6936</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre Igot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/#comment-6936</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know… I guess I am going to have to give it a try! Thanks for the suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know… I guess I am going to have to give it a try! Thanks for the suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveH</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1/#comment-6935</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2007/04/19/cant-stand-microsoft-word-2004-for-mac-os-x-try-wordperfect-in-windows-xp-for-a-while%e2%80%a6/#comment-6935</guid>
		<description>Would AbiWord give you a simpler round trip as it can read and write WordPerfect files in theory? I haven&#039;t used it in years and that was way back on BeOS so can&#039;t comment on its abilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would AbiWord give you a simpler round trip as it can read and write WordPerfect files in theory? I haven&#8217;t used it in years and that was way back on BeOS so can&#8217;t comment on its abilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

