<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s tech note about missing messages in Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betalogue.com/2006/06/13/apples-tech-note-about-missing-messages-in-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2006/06/13/apples-tech-note-about-missing-messages-in-mail/</link>
	<description>Notes from an unfinished world…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: deej</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2006/06/13/apples-tech-note-about-missing-messages-in-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-8312</link>
		<dc:creator>deej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2006/06/13/apples-tech-note-about-missing-messages-in-mail/#comment-8312</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I&#039;ve been a loyal Apple guy since the 80s (I still have a functioning Apple IIe along with lots of other models) and use Macs every day in critical production work -- but I fear the romance is over. Indeed, it appears that this once loved champion of quality user friendly creative technology is becoming like everything else: market share and profits rule… and screw the people who&#039;s backs you built it all on.

Not good. Maybe the world needs a new &quot;Apple.&quot;

Cheers,

deej</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a loyal Apple guy since the 80s (I still have a functioning Apple IIe along with lots of other models) and use Macs every day in critical production work &#8212; but I fear the romance is over. Indeed, it appears that this once loved champion of quality user friendly creative technology is becoming like everything else: market share and profits rule… and screw the people who&#8217;s backs you built it all on.</p>
<p>Not good. Maybe the world needs a new &#8220;Apple.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>deej</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DuckFOO</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2006/06/13/apples-tech-note-about-missing-messages-in-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-6200</link>
		<dc:creator>DuckFOO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2006/06/13/apples-tech-note-about-missing-messages-in-mail/#comment-6200</guid>
		<description>I use Go To Folder frequently. It is a great way to access hidden porn!

go to ~/.porn.noindex

The inital period keeps the folder from being seen in the Finder and the .noindex extention on the folder keeps Spotlight from index it&#039;s contents. Woohoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Go To Folder frequently. It is a great way to access hidden porn!</p>
<p>go to ~/.porn.noindex</p>
<p>The inital period keeps the folder from being seen in the Finder and the .noindex extention on the folder keeps Spotlight from index it&#8217;s contents. Woohoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawk Wings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Missing messages muddle in Apple technote</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2006/06/13/apples-tech-note-about-missing-messages-in-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-6199</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawk Wings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Missing messages muddle in Apple technote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2006/06/13/apples-tech-note-about-missing-messages-in-mail/#comment-6199</guid>
		<description>[...] And he does. Have a read . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And he does. Have a read . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Igot</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2006/06/13/apples-tech-note-about-missing-messages-in-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-6197</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre Igot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2006/06/13/apples-tech-note-about-missing-messages-in-mail/#comment-6197</guid>
		<description>Yes, there is something to be said for the &quot;straightforwardness&quot; of accessing files or folders through the &quot;Go&quot; menu. But it makes you wonder: How did Apple provide tech support in the good old days of the classic Mac OS? Back then, the Finder was purely spatial, and they had no choice but to guide users using spatial terms and instructions. Like ssp said, the only real reason why they have to use the &quot;Go&quot; menu here today is that the rest of the Finder has become such a mess. 

I agree that the &quot;Go To Folder&quot; command is useful to access normally invisible folders, but that&#039;s a pretty specialized requirement. The average user is not really supposed to access invisible folders.

I tend to avoid comparing Apple&#039;s tech notes to the competition. It&#039;s just too depressing :). 

I still feel that this tech note is particularly bad, because the error that it describes and supposedly helps you solve can happen to anyone who uses Mail, i.e. just about any kind of user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, there is something to be said for the &#8220;straightforwardness&#8221; of accessing files or folders through the &#8220;Go&#8221; menu. But it makes you wonder: How did Apple provide tech support in the good old days of the classic Mac OS? Back then, the Finder was purely spatial, and they had no choice but to guide users using spatial terms and instructions. Like ssp said, the only real reason why they have to use the &#8220;Go&#8221; menu here today is that the rest of the Finder has become such a mess. </p>
<p>I agree that the &#8220;Go To Folder&#8221; command is useful to access normally invisible folders, but that&#8217;s a pretty specialized requirement. The average user is not really supposed to access invisible folders.</p>
<p>I tend to avoid comparing Apple&#8217;s tech notes to the competition. It&#8217;s just too depressing :). </p>
<p>I still feel that this tech note is particularly bad, because the error that it describes and supposedly helps you solve can happen to anyone who uses Mail, i.e. just about any kind of user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Aitken</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2006/06/13/apples-tech-note-about-missing-messages-in-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-6196</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Aitken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2006/06/13/apples-tech-note-about-missing-messages-in-mail/#comment-6196</guid>
		<description>This is not one of the worst kbase articles on the Apple kbase. It&#039;s not perfect, and could do with a bit of a re-write, along the lines you suggest - but it&#039;s not the worst I&#039;ve seen.

On the whole, Apple&#039;s kbase articles are usually pretty good. Dantz&#039;s Extensis&#039;s and Quark&#039;s kbases are much worse. It is nigh on impossible to find things in the Microsoft kbase, and are usually extremely technical when you find them.

Using the &quot;Go&quot; menu is the easiest way to get people where they need to be, with the minimum amount of fuss. These tech notes have to be relevant to the lowest common denominator - in this case, the &quot;hard of understanding&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not one of the worst kbase articles on the Apple kbase. It&#8217;s not perfect, and could do with a bit of a re-write, along the lines you suggest &#8211; but it&#8217;s not the worst I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p>On the whole, Apple&#8217;s kbase articles are usually pretty good. Dantz&#8217;s Extensis&#8217;s and Quark&#8217;s kbases are much worse. It is nigh on impossible to find things in the Microsoft kbase, and are usually extremely technical when you find them.</p>
<p>Using the &#8220;Go&#8221; menu is the easiest way to get people where they need to be, with the minimum amount of fuss. These tech notes have to be relevant to the lowest common denominator &#8211; in this case, the &#8220;hard of understanding&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssp</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2006/06/13/apples-tech-note-about-missing-messages-in-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-6195</link>
		<dc:creator>ssp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2006/06/13/apples-tech-note-about-missing-messages-in-mail/#comment-6195</guid>
		<description>1. Judging from the behaviour I&#039;ve seen from Apple so far _I_ would be completely surprised if they admitted _any_ problem with their hard or software. They may have a massive database of &#039;hints&#039; for solving problems caused by their buggy software but each one of them reads like they&#039;re the good guys here who help you out of some difficult situation which you managed to get into somehow. (And of course it&#039;s your fault... nobody forced you to use Apple&#039;s software after all). Denial is it in this situation.

2. Error messages _are_ a hard thing. And I doubt that programmers will ever be able to cover all possible errors adequately. (When tinkering with iTunes&#039; resources, for example, and accidentally breaking them in the process, I got an &#039;not enough memory to launch iTunes&#039; message when launching the application the next time. Obviously this was easy to understand for me in my situation, but it is a _real_ error giving a misleading message.)

3. The Go Menu: I suspect that this may be less a fondness of Unix-style clunkiness but rather a consequence of the whole Finder having become highly illogical and unpredictable. There are so many different ways to set up your Finder and so many different way for it to display its windows - which can change from folder to folder depending on what you did before - that using the Go to Folder command may actually be the most straightforward and just works™ way to describe these steps to people.

3a. I use the Go To Folder command quite regularly btw. To go to the /tmp folder for example. Way better than having to open a Terminal and type open /tmp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Judging from the behaviour I&#8217;ve seen from Apple so far _I_ would be completely surprised if they admitted _any_ problem with their hard or software. They may have a massive database of &#8216;hints&#8217; for solving problems caused by their buggy software but each one of them reads like they&#8217;re the good guys here who help you out of some difficult situation which you managed to get into somehow. (And of course it&#8217;s your fault&#8230; nobody forced you to use Apple&#8217;s software after all). Denial is it in this situation.</p>
<p>2. Error messages _are_ a hard thing. And I doubt that programmers will ever be able to cover all possible errors adequately. (When tinkering with iTunes&#8217; resources, for example, and accidentally breaking them in the process, I got an &#8216;not enough memory to launch iTunes&#8217; message when launching the application the next time. Obviously this was easy to understand for me in my situation, but it is a _real_ error giving a misleading message.)</p>
<p>3. The Go Menu: I suspect that this may be less a fondness of Unix-style clunkiness but rather a consequence of the whole Finder having become highly illogical and unpredictable. There are so many different ways to set up your Finder and so many different way for it to display its windows &#8211; which can change from folder to folder depending on what you did before &#8211; that using the Go to Folder command may actually be the most straightforward and just works™ way to describe these steps to people.</p>
<p>3a. I use the Go To Folder command quite regularly btw. To go to the /tmp folder for example. Way better than having to open a Terminal and type open /tmp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

