<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mail 2.0: Should have a command to separate wrongly threaded messages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betalogue.com/2006/03/24/mail-20-should-have-a-command-to-separate-wrongly-threaded-messages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2006/03/24/mail-20-should-have-a-command-to-separate-wrongly-threaded-messages/</link>
	<description>Notes from an unfinished world…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:55:15 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hawk Wings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mail.app: Two gripes and a bouquet</title>
		<link>http://www.betalogue.com/2006/03/24/mail-20-should-have-a-command-to-separate-wrongly-threaded-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-4605</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawk Wings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mail.app: Two gripes and a bouquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betalogue.com/2006/03/24/mail-20-should-have-a-command-to-separate-wrongly-threaded-messages/#comment-4605</guid>
		<description>[...] Pierre Igot at Betalogue is frustrated  by the not-very-smart algorithm that controls the way Mail threads messages. It doesn&#8217;t have to as dumb as it is, he reckons: As far as I know, Mail also uses unique e-mail message identifiers in the message headers to follow threads even when subject lines are changed. So it obviously can be smart in some cases. Why does it have to be so dumb in other cases? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pierre Igot at Betalogue is frustrated  by the not-very-smart algorithm that controls the way Mail threads messages. It doesn&#8217;t have to as dumb as it is, he reckons: As far as I know, Mail also uses unique e-mail message identifiers in the message headers to follow threads even when subject lines are changed. So it obviously can be smart in some cases. Why does it have to be so dumb in other cases? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
